Desire.
Grief. Sorrow. The films of Wim Wenders possess the unique capacity
to channel these human emotions forcing the spectator to face the
overarching dilemma of living with hope and despair. In one of the
final scenes of Wenders' Paris,
Texas,
Travis, the lost protagonist, explains his four year disappearance:
“And
for the first time, he wished he were far away. Lost in a deep, vast
country where nobody knew him. Somewhere without language, or
streets. He dreamed about this place without knowing its name.”
In
a city like New York, subjected to the continual onslaught of snow,
sleet, and congestion, Wenders’ films came to the Museum of Modern
Art for two weeks and screened for an audience familiar with
continuous gray skies or visitors first experiencing them.
From
March 2 through 17, MoMA screened a program encompassing 20 of
Wenders’ early works and shorts, music videos, and feature films.
In collaboration with the Berlin International Film Festival and
Deutsche Kinemathek – Museum für Film und Fernsehen, the program
exhibits the breadth of Wenders’ cinematic contribution from his
early 16mm experimental works to his feature films to his recent
nonfiction works. During the first week, Wenders introduced the
featured retrospective films and take part in post-film discussions
with his longtime collaborator and writer, Peter Handke. The
following week consisted of a second run of some of the feature
films as well as shorts, providing another opportunity to catch one
of his works on a theater screen.
The
variety of films screened during MoMA's program are what make it
truly special, separating it from other retrospectives which might
only offer the chance to see feature films thus neglecting the
artist's early or experimental works which may have impacted the more
popular films audiences have come to know. Programs that explore and
exhibit the less popular or unknown works of an artist are enticing
and allow curators
to venture outside the expected programming and take chances. Paolo
Cherchi Usai argues in his article “A Charter of Curatorial Values”
for the NFSA
Journal
that “There
are successful artists who have occasionally
produced works generally dismissed by contemporary audiences: these
are the works the curator should aim at first, because the likelihood that they will be lost is comparatively high.”While Wenders' less notable or respected films might not seem the
best choice for gathering an audience, it is the responsible decision
for a curator when it comes to preservation to raise awareness of the
films so that preservation is not based solely on popularity and
acceptance from the contemporary audience but rather maintaining
access to the films for future generations.
I
attended the screening the new digital restoration of the 1984
Cannes International Film Festival Palme d’Or winning film, Paris,
Texas. The curators describe Paris,
Texas
as
“a meditation on the American West and a road movie like no
other, with stark, spare dialogue written by Sam Shepard, a haunting
slide-guitar score by Ry Cooder, and cinematography by Robby Müller
that recalls the paintings of Edward Hopper and the 1970s New
Topographics photography of Robert Adams and Lewis Baltz. Harry Dean
Stanton plays a distant stranger trying to make right as he travels
across the unforgiving Texas desert to reconnect in Los Angeles with
a son he hasn’t seen in years, and then on to Houston in search of
his estranged wife. The film culminates in a set of iconic monologues
between the erstwhile lovers that take place on either side of a
peepshow booth.”
New
York has many opportunities for people to attend special programs
that feature artists in person, and while these screenings are often
crowded or sold out there is always another screening and another
artist. In a time when society seeks entertainment and art through
avenues such as the internet, it is increasingly hard to hold
interest in visiting a theater or museum. In the collaborative
article by Robert Cargni-Mitchell,
Bruce Goldstein, Gary Meyer, James Quandt, and Jackie Raynal, “Repertory
Film Programming: A Web Exclusive Supplement
to a Critical Symposium”, they argue that “if
viewing a movie on
video or a computer screen means experiencing an approximation of the
work of art but not the work of art itself, then the world’s
cinematheques and the men and women who program them play an
indispensable role in keeping cinema’s heritage alive.” This statement confirms the importance of exhibiting a film in its
original form and presentation setting, underlining the increasingly
difficult and evolving responsibility of both the archivist, who
preserves the film, and the curator, who exhibits the film.
The
screening began with an introduction from the MoMA film curator ,
Joshua Siegel, who gave a brief description of Wenders' background
and many achievements, such as his most notable films and awards
including the 2015 Honorary Golden Bear award for lifetime
achievement. Siegel continued by describing the rest of the program
and explained how it had been divided into three sections: early
works, documentaries, and feature films. Following, Wenders
introduced Paris,
Texas
, stating that the film and soundtrack were inspired by the blues
gospel song written by Blind Willie Johnson, “Dark Was the Night,
Cold Was the Ground”. Not wanting to spoil the film for members of
the audience seeing it for the first time, Wenders refrained from
describing the plot. Instead he referred to the script writing
process of the film and his close collaboration with Sam Shepard,
explaining that at first he wanted Shepard to play the role of
Travis. However, Shepard rejected the offer saying that he knew too
much about the part which eventually led Wenders to cast Harry Dean
Stanton. Wenders continued to describe Stanton as the ideal actor for
the part and his many achievements and prior work in his career from
the beginning to the present. After Wenders' introduction, the
screening of the new 4K digital restoration began for a full theater.
Ry Cooder covering Blind Willie Johnson's "Dark was the Night, Cold was the Ground"
The
program was organized in collaboration by Joshua Siegel, Curator,
Department of Film, with Rajendra Roy, The Celeste Bartos Chief
Curator of Film, MoMA, and Thomas Beard, an independent curator. The
MoMA film calendar provided detailed and helpful information for
those interested in the screening. On the website, there is a
description for the entire program underlining the three sections and
their major works, the filmmaker himself, additional features of the
program such as Q & A sessions, introductions, and discussions,
and recent preservation work completed on the screened films.
Additionally, MoMA created a trailer for the program that includes
clips from all of the films, a description of Wenders and the
importance of his work, how the program was built, and MoMA’s
collaborators. Each film screening is described, accompanied by a
film still and the showtimes directly beneath it. The description
includes the date, director, screenplay, actors, and synopsis,
language, and running time. The format is not indicated although the
program notes the films for which MoMA will screen 4K digital
restoration. Further, since the program has now run for about 1 week,
one of the special features of the program, “An Evening with Wim
Wenders and Peter Handke”, a Q&A session held after one of the
screenings, can be viewed online.
MoMA's
curated film program utilizes its Celeste Bartos International Film
Study Center and Preservation Center to present archival materials
creating a bridge between the responsibilities of archivist and
curator.
In reference to the curator-archivist relationship, Jan-Christopher
Horak writes in his review on the book, Film
Curatorship: Archives, Museums, and the Digital Marketplace
edited by Paolo Cherchi Usai, David Francis, Alexander Horwath and
Michael Loebenstein that
“in fact, cinémathèques, film museums, and
even film archives have long curated film programs and exhibitions.
But the issue seems to be selection. Given that no institution can
collect everything, due to budget and organizational issues, it’s
no surprise that regardless of its stated policy, archives actually
do make curatorial decisions about what is to be saved and what
isn’t.” Horak points to an issue often raised within archives community about
how much an institution can preserve with the resources available and
the ethical question of making unbiased decisions on priority. It is
immensely valuable when a collecting institution, such as an archive,
library, or museum, has the resources and space for exhibition
because it provides the opportunity to screen the works and
simultaneously gain attention from the public, professionals, and
funding organizations towards preservation projects and initiatives
taking place at the institution.
In New York, and around the world, MoMA has a highly respected reputation for its collections and exhibitions which benefits the care and management of its collections and captures the attention of archivists, donors, other funding parties, and even people outside the museum or archives field to support preservation efforts. Holding an event such as the Wim Wenders retrospective at MoMA supports the filmmaker, institution, and field of preservation underlining the importance of curated programs and their relationship with archives and archival practices.
In New York, and around the world, MoMA has a highly respected reputation for its collections and exhibitions which benefits the care and management of its collections and captures the attention of archivists, donors, other funding parties, and even people outside the museum or archives field to support preservation efforts. Holding an event such as the Wim Wenders retrospective at MoMA supports the filmmaker, institution, and field of preservation underlining the importance of curated programs and their relationship with archives and archival practices.
1Paolo
Cherchi Usai, “A Charter of Curatorial Values,” NFSA
Journal,
Volume 1, No. 1 (2006).
2MoMA
Department of Communications, “MoMA Celebrates German Filmmaker
Wim Wenders with a Major Career Retrospective,”MoMA Press Reslease
(2015).
3
Robert Cargni-Mitchell, Bruce Goldstein, Gary Meyer, James Quandt,
and Jackie Raynal, “ Repertory
Film Programming: A Web Exclusive Supplement
to a Critical Symposium,” Cineaste,Vol.XXXV No.2 (2010).
4
Jan-Christopher Horak, book review on Film
Curatorship: Archives, Museums, and the Digital Marketplace,
edited by Paolo Cherchi Usai, DavidFrancis, Alexander Horwath and
Michael Loebenstein, Senses
of Cinema,
(2010).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.